Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems. What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them?
The issue of road sharing between cyclists and car drivers has generated much concern among people. Thus it is the aim of this essay to elaborate on the consequences and propose some solutions to tackle the problem.
It is obvious that the matters of sharing the same roads are complicated. Firstly, it is the root cause of several injuries and accidents. In other words, there are many cyclists who do not obey traffic rules while car drivers are turning. Apparently, drivers are unaware of cyclists and would absolutely cause deadly road accidents. Another matter is that road sharing would discourage people from commuting by bike. This directly results in environmental damage and pollution, particularly in urban areas. Take Beijing, which is one of the most polluted cities in the world, as an example, most people participating in Peking University’s survey say that they do not cycle to their workplace due to the fact that cars and bikes have to share the same road, which is definitely inconvenient and unsafe for cyclists.
Accordingly, the solutions to the aforementioned issues should also be varied. First and foremost, governments should divide lanes between cars and bikes. To be more specific, there should be a road constructed solely for cyclists. The Netherlands serve as a perfect example for this solution. Thanks to specialized lanes for bikes, the number of accidents caused by the issue of road sharing have been recorded to decrease significantly. Moreover, since the advent of dividing lanes, Netherlanders are more fascinated to travel by bike. Another proposition is that authorities and national leaders should adopt restrictions on car drivers. More specifically, there should be more road signs such as on speed limits so as to reduce not only the volume of cars on road but also the number of road accidents.
To summarize, several problems are caused by road sharing between cyclists and car drivers. I believe that we should take measures including dividing lanes and enact restrictions on cars to solve those disturbing issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-15 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | bibiane chou | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Đặng Luân | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | minayoung | 61 | view |
- the recycling process of glass bottles 89
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 84
- The figures give information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the recycling process of glass bottles 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...as generated much concern among people. Thus it is the aim of this essay to elaborat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...more road signs such as on speed limits so as to reduce not only the volume of cars on r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, while, as to, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19461077844 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87596786328 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.2696152164 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3157894737 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301926876463 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920318622908 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794585490274 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194163672587 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313151026195 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.