The diagram shows changes in Felistone in the UL between 1967 and 2001
The two maps give information about the changes in the layout of the British city of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001.
In general, the layout of Felixstone has significantly changed with additional services and the loss of several areas. The town changed to a sea tourism area.
Farmland was located behind the shop to the east of the High Street completely replaced and redeveloped by a new hotel, a swimming, and two tennis courts. Two large shops were on two sides of the road, and the golf course experienced no change.
The fish market on the other side of the road has also been replaced by a
private beach, while the marina pier near the shore opened in place of a public beach. The coffee shop and the hotel remained, and the dune reduced in size next to the new parking lot. Finally, near the seashore, a range of wind turbines was installed.
- The pie charts show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown bel 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of the road has also been replaced by a private beach, while the marina pier nea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 24.0651302605 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 1615.20841683 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 153.0 315.596192385 48% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60784313725 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 4.20363070211 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4465231803 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 176.041082164 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 506.74238477 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9005141354 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.125 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106870950445 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490636555102 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081624166641 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681549657231 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969828308548 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 78.4519038076 40% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.