Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays all over the world, people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits, and TV channels. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that the world is becoming a global village because of the global reach of the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. I believe that this trend has both positive and negative consequences.
Globalization can be seen as a positive development because it makes everything possible and accessible. Nowadays, the improvement in communication technologies has increased and facilitated the cultural and language interchange between various countries. As a result, many people can gain whatever they want from different parts of the world. With global advancements in technology, many companies can keep individuals informed of their products and brands through various kinds of media, such as social networks and TV channels. They have this facility to export their commodities on the world stage, which not only has helped the companies to progress and increase their profit worldwide but also only has given foreign people an opportunity to use some international products with high quality. This trend is also true for other items, including fashions and eating habits. For example, by searching the Internet, people can have access to the recipes of multinational healthy food in order to have more options to eat a balanced diet. Additionally, they can even follow the latest fashion trends shown on Instagram, TV channels and magazines to keep up with their foreign counterparts.
However, this development might one day devalue the traditional customs of a nation. Global access to fashions and brands can discourage individuals to buy the local products of their country. This condition can put native craftsmen out of work which is not a positive outcome for a country. Also, by following international eating habits, many individuals might be disillusioned to eat their local cuisine. This situation can cause such traditional food items to be forgotten after a while and the future generation will become deprived of them. Moreover, globalization can easily void the opportunity of countries for economic growth through tourism, as the same things are available around the globe.
In conclusion, in my view, the disappearance of differences between the countries due to the global access to the same fashions, advertisements, brands, eating habits and TV channels can have both advantages and disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45901639344 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07341953066 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53825136612 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0921461979 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.529411765 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213119541739 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707437743415 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529548035619 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158452333249 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453844975323 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.