Dogs are one of the most popular pets in the world, yet many would, yet many would say it is inappropriate to have them in built-up inner-city areas?
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, there is a debate going on amongst the people that keeping a dog is inappropriate in developed inner-city areas. Whereas, I totally disagree with the following statement, and the reasons for that are explained below.
On the first hand, dogs are considered one of the best and true friends of people who will never dishonor their master. Yet, due to a few reasons, people find it difficult to live with dogs in their surroundings. One of the main and major issues is improper management of dogs waste, which directly affects the hygiene of others in cities. Secondly, a significant number of dog owners abandon their beloved pets on the streets which is dangerous for the dogs as well as the local people traveling regularly from nearby.
On the other hand, humans will have to do what it requires to live with their pets wherever they want to. With respect to cities; nowadays, urban developers do consider all these factors and plan accordingly. Major developments like dog parks, dogs walkway, and many more are beautiful examples of what we should do for our pets. Also, there are many dog trainers available in the market who can help any person with any sort of difficulties related to their dog misbehavior. Last but not least, medical facilities are also made available by the government for the vaccination of dogs as well as their treatment.
To conclude my essay, I would always say that dogs are god gifted animals to humans. There are many incidents where dogs have proved to us that no other living thing on the planet can love its owner more. The only requirement is town development so that dogs can also mix with humans in concrete jungles and live happily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-21 | Awadhesh Mourya | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | gulbakhyt_90 | 38 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | vuictorovna | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | freak | 68 | view |
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal 61
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 85
- The dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'living'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: living
...humans will have to do what it requires to live with their pets wherever they want to. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, sort of, as well as, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82130584192 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58060729595 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.8781153784 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198773733636 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06978398154 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330532460017 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120168682585 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170585019676 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.