Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading. To what extend do you agree?
Engaging in an enjoyable activity with a child can have a more profound impact on their overall skills development and creativity compared to simply reading. I strongly agree with this statement as it allows for active participation and hands-on learning experiences, which are crucial for a child's holistic development.
When children engage in interactive activities such as painting, building blocks, or playing a musical instrument with an adult, they are actively using their motor skills, problem-solving abilities, and imagination. These activities provide opportunities for children to explore, experiment, and express their ideas freely. For instance, when a child builds a tower using blocks, they not only enhance their fine motor skills but also learn about balance, spatial relationships, and cause-and-effect.
In contrast, reading, although important for language development and expanding knowledge, is a passive activity where the child is primarily listening or observing. While reading exposes children to new vocabulary, concepts, and stories, it does not always provide the same level of engagement and active participation as hands-on activities. For example, when a child reads a story about gardening, they acquire information about plants, but if they actually engage in gardening with an adult, they can experience firsthand the joy of planting seeds, caring for plants, and observing their growth, fostering a deeper understanding and appreciation for nature.
Furthermore, interactive activities promote creativity and imagination. When children are involved in art projects, pretend play, or music, they are encouraged to think creatively, make decisions, and express themselves in unique ways. They learn to think outside the box and develop their own ideas, which are crucial skills for problem-solving and innovation in the future.
In conclusion, while reading is undoubtedly beneficial for a child's language skills, engaging in enjoyable activities with an adult offers a more comprehensive approach to their overall skills development and creativity. By actively participating in hands-on experiences, children acquire a wide range of skills, from fine motor abilities to critical thinking and creative problem-solving. Therefore, it is essential to provide children with opportunities for interactive learning and play alongside reading to support their holistic growth.
- Some people say that to prevent illness and disease governments should focus more on reducing environmental population and housing problems To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
- some people believe that children of all ages should have extra responsibilities for example helping at home or at work Others believe that outside of school children should be free to enjoy their lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 73
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95114942529 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25535398505 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537356321839 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 0.809619238477 1112% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5810107519 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.928571429 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322269960918 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128723293597 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089834866289 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212920282666 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900159319174 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.