companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree

Essay topics:

companies should provide sports facilities for local communities. To what extend do you agree?

The question of whether companies should provide sports facilities for local communities has been a subject of debate. While some argue that it is the responsibility of companies to offer such amenities, others believe it should be the government's role. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and present my own perspective.

Proponents of companies providing sports facilities argue that it is within their means and capabilities. With their financial resources, companies can invest in infrastructure that benefits the community. For instance, constructing a community gym or sponsoring sports teams can promote an active lifestyle and combat sedentary habits. Additionally, by fostering a sense of community and camaraderie through sports activities, companies can create a positive impact on residents' lives. For example, a manufacturing company can allocate a portion of its profits to build a soccer field for local children, encouraging physical activity and team spirit.

However, there are those who contend that the responsibility lies with the government. They argue that governments are elected to serve the needs of citizens and should allocate public funds for constructing and maintaining sports facilities. This ensures equal access for all members of society, regardless of their financial backgrounds. Government involvement also guarantees proper regulation and oversight to ensure the safety and inclusivity of the facilities. For instance, a government can establish a public park with various sports amenities, ensuring that individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds can enjoy the benefits of sports and recreation.

In my opinion, while it is commendable for companies to contribute to the community by providing sports facilities, it should not be their sole responsibility. The government should play a significant role in facilitating and supporting the development of such facilities. Collaboration between the private sector and the government can lead to more comprehensive and sustainable solutions. For example, a company can partner with the government to establish a sports complex, with the government overseeing its accessibility and maintenance.

In conclusion, while companies can make valuable contributions by providing sports facilities, the government should take the lead in this area. A collaborative effort between the private and public sectors is essential to ensure the availability of sports facilities for all members of the local community. By working together, we can create a healthier and more inclusive society where individuals have access to recreational opportunities that promote physical and mental well-being.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-18 Huyenlbg87 89 view
2024-05-21 Sandeep USA 73 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 56 view
2024-03-04 Ahmad_off 73 view
Essays by user duyenlf :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether companies should provide sports facilit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...nities, others believe it should be the governments role. This essay will discuss both view...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90769230769 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35852022767 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 718.2 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1852450666 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307974194321 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107885106404 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107258753523 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204824493643 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617242321777 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.