Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about the responsibility of protecting the environment. While many argued that politicians should be in charge of environmental protection, I am more convinced that each individual should take that issue into account.
On the one hand, it is common to say that authorities must take action to protect the environment as they have power and the attention of citizens in the country. For example, the rice president can change related environmental issues by opening an investigation or shutting down companies that are on the list of potentially harming the surrounding environment. Additionally, there are some problems such as global warming, prolonged droughts, or other extreme weather events that are too big for individuals to deal with. Therefore, only governments can provide special equipment, modern technological devices to experienced scientists to find effective solutions to tackle those problems.
However, I believe that individuals also play a vital role in environmental protection. First, by turning used items such as plastic bottles into new items, we can cut down on waste and energy consumption. Moreover, composting food waste will help create nutrient-rich soil instead of making it become landfill waste. Second, transport conservation is another thing we can do since one of the biggest sources of greenhouse gases is transportation. If citizens are encouraged to travel by public transport instead of private vehicles like cars, this will reduce a considerable amount of gas emissions which is the main cause of air pollution. From these points, we can confirm that if one person does the right things, the result is nothing but when all people do the right things, the result would be massive.
In conclusion, environmental responsibility is shown to be more significant where an individual believes in the efficacy of their pro-environmental behaviour and where the self is perceived to be a responsible agent compared with other social agents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gent compared with other social agents.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, another thing, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47266881029 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21477806813 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655948553055 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2363942081 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.923076923 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239098856472 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713414834999 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479101706787 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134799852893 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212862079446 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.