Imbalance distribution of minimum resources food,shelter and clothing is defining characteristic of poverty. There is pre-conceived notion that only people in undeveloped countries are poor. Whereas, the fact is, irrespective of how much a country is developed there is always certain section of society who are underline poverty. Factors like, including inefficient fiscal policies, illiteracy, unemployment are some of common reasons. Certainly all nations, according to their requirements, inculcate methods to eradicate impoverishment. In this essay we will discuss various reasons behind this social problem and welfare activities implemented to curb it.
There are plethora of reasons for this situation. However, for sake of the sake of discussion, we figure-out few circumstances and action plan to be deployed for combating with. Prima facie, predicaments for bringing equilibrium in wealth distribution is because of inefficient legislations. Every nation is failing to recognise overwhelming stagnation of money with small proportion of community while millions suffering from destitution. Along-with, illiteracy is growing day by day hindering skills of talented youth. Almost 35% of world population, as per survey of Global Economic Times, has low literacy rate. As a result, procuring jobs for meeting expenses is becoming impossible. On the other hand, we have natural calamities like severe draught causing fall in food production piling up on already diminishing living standards.
Though it seems like walking on tightrope, working within framework formulated by World Economic Forum , solution is at the edge of the horizon. Accordingly, to scaledown wealth concentration, governments must amend taxation laws. Further, sufficient statistics to be maintained to keep poverty check in population. As a counter measure to job-scarcity self -employment opportunities should provided by encouraging family business. Once again, it's government duty to give some incentives for start-ups. For example, recently Indian Prime Minister announced lucrative schemes for new entrepreneurs under 'Make in India Scheme'. Surprisingly, this lead to GDP growth for year 2018 is 15%. Finally, free education can help for convincing parents to send their children to schools.
In conclusion, we can say that collective action and perseverance can guide us to utopic society. In addition, we have international organisations and NGO's to work onside with government to eliminate poverty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
Imbalance distribution of minimum resources food,shelter and clothing is defining c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , shelter
...e distribution of minimum resources food,shelter and clothing is defining characteristic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...re is always certain section of society who are underline poverty. Factors like, includ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion is failing to recognise overwhelming stagnation of money with small proportio...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ework formulated by World Economic Forum , solution is at the edge of the horizon....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, however, so, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88950276243 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28898854991 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.718232044199 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9149896278 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231624418966 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507121177082 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456967044743 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108988262932 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039572519065 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.29 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 78.4519038076 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.