Exams are commonly used in most schools and universities. Some people think exams should be replaced by other forms of assessment. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing exams with other forms of assessment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of educational policies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that schools' issues can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, adopting alternative ways of assessment in universities can provide the society with some noticabel effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of student's transcripts and teaching strategies are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed ana academic experiment which discovered the role of examination in schools. Therefore, beneficial ramifications on academic institutions' development apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, adhering to current assessment approaches can might increase the consequences of an insufficient learning. Moreover, fundamental aspects of university exams could relate to this reality that the demerits of graduation certificates pertain to low education quality. As a tangible example, some scientific experiment performed by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of schools' improvements are vividly crucial. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of a computrized assessment.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of choosing modern assessment procedures far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of universities' examination boards prove the significane of schools' assessment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...e, beneficial ramifications on academic institutions development apparently can be seen. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88803088803 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38775312637 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65250965251 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9552922838 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211429620985 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669367720962 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613107624928 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112693211266 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268746330172 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.