There are both advantages and disadvantages of company workers accessing their own products and services. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of company employees' access to their products and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of employment policies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that manufacturing strategies can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using producted items by workers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of job offers are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered producers' requirements. Hence, beneficial ramifications of the company products legislation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, availability of goods for company's labors might increase the consequences of products' quality inspection. Moreover, fundamental aspects of higher-quality goods could relate to this reality that the demerits of the quality assurance are negatively correlated. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a presitigious university has demonstrated the downsides of employees' satisfaction. Thus, it is not correct to presume the preconceived notions of business owners.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of company products accessablity of products far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of qualified products prove the significance of an effective company management procedure but also pinpoint implications of future products
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82745098039 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36545080652 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1604257288 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245322633362 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721991626792 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069312571374 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128318236633 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622689445389 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.