Mass media, including TV, radio and newspapers, plays a pivotal role in shaping our opinions and characters. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of mass media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of media strategies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughouly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I personaly am inclined to believe that the role of radio can ba a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, massive media can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of personal characteristics are inextricbly bound up. According to my own exprience , when I was a university tudent , I performed and academic experiment which demonstrated effectiveness of communities' opinions. Hence, beneficial ramifications of professional journalists apprently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, virtual media might increase the consequences of advanced media. Moreover, fundamental aspects of TV channels. As a tangible example some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of radio signals are clearly visible. Thus, it would be correct if we could presume the preconceived notions of how human characters can be shaped.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of multi-lateral media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of progressive newspapers prove the significance of TV programs, but also pinpoint implications of human behaviors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... bound up. According to my own exprience , when I was a university tudent , I perf...
^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...prience , when I was a university tudent , I performed and academic experiment whi...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er, fundamental aspects of TV channels. As a tangible example some scientific rese...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65384615385 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.370780689 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700854700855 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2829033479 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129077629504 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416178626836 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268650472027 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699204490248 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327731114572 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.