Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
Despite the progress of the world, issues concerning the environment have been insurmountable problems that are considered worldwide catastrophes due to the natural damage caused by humans. There are easily identified reasons, but the major cause is related to industrial development. From my viewpoint, both governmental and local authorities play an integral role in tackling this problem.
The increasing world population is putting great pressure on the environment, which leads to three major factors of environmental damage. First and foremost, the demand for using raw materials by mineral extraction has resulted in the depletion of natural supplies. Let’s take Russia and the US as examples, as they both have to deal with the serious problem of the shortage of fuels such as coal and oil for their daily lives. Secondly, industrial businesses have had negative employer environmental impacts for some time. To be more specific, employers desire to manufacture various products without any environmentally friendly process, so a wide range of smoke is emitted into the air that causes greenhouse glass and global warming. Last but not least, individuals at present time are suffering from poisonous food because of polluting activities which also affect millions of species and their habit.
As a result, the authorities at all level- social, national and international governments need to go seeking to prevent the environment degradation. Firstly, strict policies should be introduced to limit emissions from factories. Moreover, it is essential to impose an official ban on illegal industries such as deforestation, dumping toxic waste, etc. International bodies have to give a hand to alleviate an issue by raising individual's awareness. Besides, although people just play a part of the solution, they also try to change their way of consumption by using fewer packaged products and recycling them as well. Finally, protecting the environment is a long-term project that requires the prevalence of humans.
In conclusion, environmental pollution is an ongoing issue which may threaten the safety of our society. Therefore, all individuals must be held accountable for avoiding ecological crisis, particularly governments, who alone have the power to enforce laws to protect our precious environment. Unless the problem is solved, we will face to the worst living conditions so far.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-23 | huongnguyendieu | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-10 | congnguyen05x204 | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Sen Ho | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | jadenguyen | 56 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 89
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity What solutions can you suggest 89
- In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...a hand to alleviate an issue by raising individuals awareness. Besides, although people jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54495912807 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1160799159 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66485013624 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0166631959 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.055555556 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967768345874 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267897686488 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.020956791266 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0567830720672 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113069271955 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.