The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
GLOBAL WARMING IS THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IN THIS WORLD. PEOPLE USES MANY PRODUCTS WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING THEIR IMPACT ON THE PLANET. SOME THINK THAT, THE CONSUMPTION OF FOSSIL FUELS SAFELY BY RESEARCHING AND INVENTING COULD BE THE BIGGEST ACHIEVEMENT IN TODAY’S LIFE. FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, THIS COULD HELP HUMAN AS WELL AS THE LIVES OF ANIMALS. IT COULD HELP TO DESTROY OUR EARTH.
TO BEGIN WITH, EXPLORING THE WAY HOW THE FOSSIL FUELS COULD BE USED CAN TACKLE THE ENVIRONMENT’S PROBLEMS. IN OTHER WORDS, IN THIS MODERN WORLD, MOSTLY PEOPLE CONSUME DIFFERENT TYPE OF FOSSIL FUELS LIKE CARBURANT FOR CARS, COAL FOR HEATING AND SO ON. IF RESEARCHERS EXPLORE HOW THESE CAN BE USED SAFELY THAN THIS WILL NOT HAVE NEGATIVE IMPACTS ON THE GLOBAL WARMING. FOR EXAMPLE, SUDDEN DECREASE AND INCREASE OF TEMPERATURES, TSUNAMI, EARTHQUAKES. SO, EXPLORATION IS IMPORTANT FOR THE WHOLE WORLD.
ON THE OTHER HAND, DEVELOPING THESE SOURCES CAN ADAPT HUMANS AND ANIMALS LIFE. TO BE CLEAR, MOST OF THE PRODUCTS ARE MADE BY THE BONES OF ANIMALS SUCH AS COAL. PEOPLE KILL THEM FOR THEIR BENEFIT BUT THEY DO NOT SEE THE LOSE OF SOME ANIMALS LIKE DINASOURS AND SO MANY OTHERS. MOREOVER, THESE COME FROM THE PLANTS WHICH ARE HELPFUL FOR THE FRESH AIR BREATHING BY THE PEOPLE. I THINK IF THEY DO SOME INVENTIONS THEY COULD BE USED SAFELY WITHOUT ANY DETERIORATION.
IN CONCLUSION, I TOTALLY AGREE THAT, NEW INVENTIONS AND SEARCH OF THE USE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOSSIL FUELS ARE HELPFUL. THEY CAN TACKLE THE HAZARDOUS ON THE PLANET.
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statements 73
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statements 56
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statements 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “IF” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...T FOR CARS, COAL FOR HEATING AND SO ON. IF RESEARCHERS EXPLORE HOW THESE CAN BE US...
^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...M FOR THEIR BENEFIT BUT THEY DO NOT SEE THE LOSE OF SOME ANIMALS LIKE DINASOURS AND SO M...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86486486486 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5274332994 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559845559846 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0690713931 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1176470588 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2352941176 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202482899264 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611985643703 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056888743063 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117432389803 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365013834114 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “IF” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...T FOR CARS, COAL FOR HEATING AND SO ON. IF RESEARCHERS EXPLORE HOW THESE CAN BE US...
^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...M FOR THEIR BENEFIT BUT THEY DO NOT SEE THE LOSE OF SOME ANIMALS LIKE DINASOURS AND SO M...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86486486486 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5274332994 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559845559846 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0690713931 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1176470588 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2352941176 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202482899264 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611985643703 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056888743063 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117432389803 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365013834114 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.