With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

It is no denied that a huge number of people replace their regular meals with fast food because of their hectic life. While many people suppose that this kind of service can help them save a lot of time in modern life, I would argue that negative effects of fast food can be dangerous in the long run.

On the one hand, it is certain that fast food can supply people with a lot of benefits. First, fast food is always available and it can save a quantity of time. Today, people are busy all the time with their works and studying so they have little or no time for themselves. For instance, some people do not have time to cook so fast food can provide them with delicious dishes in order to regain energy to continue their works. Second, fast food is an alternative option for people when they want to change their regular meals. People sometimes may want to have new dishes instead of daily food and fast food is a great choice for them.

On the other hand, eating too much fast food have a lot of negative effects on many aspects of people’s life. First, it can be very harmful to your health. For example, consuming too much fast food can result in obesity which is often the main cause of some dangerous diseases such as high blood pressure, diabetes and even cancer. Moreover, having too much fast food can make you tired. Although fast food is often very in calorie, it often makes people feel weak and tired. This happens due to the fact that fast food does not contain important nutrients such as vitamins and minerals. As a result, long-term consumption of fast food can lead to chronic tiredness.

In conclusion, despite the convenience of fast food, eating too much fast food can bring about many negative impacts on our health. For theses reasons, I think that fast food has more disadvantages than advantages for human.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56325301205 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22177911563 2.80592935109 79% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509036144578 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7443237619 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1176470588 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404400252127 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152242443067 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796914383656 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269079002516 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417065183023 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.