Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your answer with examples and relevant evidence.
The family is known as the usual source of the most enduring and forming relationships in a childish. No doubtfully, the idea of assigning the role fully to the mother is a sign of incomplete understanding of the psychological needs of a child. Fatherhood too has a vital role to play in the growth and development of a child. The childbearing should be the responsibility of both parents so I totally disagree with just mother child bond.
In the past, there was a strong emphasis on the mother child relationship which based on the concept that women have the genetic gift for providing maternal love, care and everything the child needs for a healthy growth and development. The vast amount of evidence related to psychological requirements for bringing up a child show how significant motherhood is in the lives of children that cannot replace by anything, including fathers.
The father child bond often parallels the mother child bond, both emotionally and intensity. Father's warmth had an important effect in shaping adolescents' attitudes toward social issues such as marriage, divorce, sex roles and teenage childbearing. Apparently, the impact of fathers is not only important for preventing certain psychological problems, but also for encouraging virtuous attitudes and behavior.
To conclude with, it is important to understand that similarities do not eliminate differences; if the goal is flourishing children both mother and father are needed. In a similar yet distinct and irreplaceable way, fatherhood is an influence on children so the family can be seen clearly both psychologically and spiritually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-01 | riyashetty | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-06 | gunju3305 | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-02 | Paraklesis | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-06 | sattar_iust | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-21 | Atefeh 1248 | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the 19th century. The map below shows the development of the village. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of the village. 61
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth and resources among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves? Use your o 67
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?Use your own ideas knowledge and exp 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...t enduring and forming relationships in a childish. No doubtfully, the idea of assigning t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34241245136 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23928500482 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603112840467 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0342385816 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.818181818 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1568691918 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544815204466 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429660588012 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891871377347 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368342622254 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.