A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?
It is true that there was a rise of several languages in some countries, while the number of people who talk some languages has declined. In my opinion, this trend has both advantages and disadvantages.
On the first hand, people begin to know many kinds of languages have some benefits impacts on the community. Firstly, the most advantage is that people can communicate with others who are not native easier. For example, English is the popular language that broadens all across the world because it is very popular and easy to communicate among people with different language backgrounds. Another reason is that if citizens in A have expert more than 2 languages instead of knowing only their mother tongue will have lots of opportunities to be hired at high-paid jobs. For example, in Vietnam, many multinational companies require their employees to know how to speak English before they wanting to sign in. This is the reason why the ability to speak English or other languages that have global functionality is a necessary skill in the modern world.
On the other hand, Losing up the language will make the tradition and culture of it perish away because nobody preserves and use it, and gradually becomes the forgotten language. As a result, It hard to find out the information or relics of these lost languages which include numerous historical values. For instance, many archaeologists are trying to figure out the Maya words which have been existed around 2600 B.C to find the keys to explain this civilization is disappeared.
In conclusion, the increasing use of a few languages and the decline of others is both a positive as well as a negative development. However, I believe that we also need to seek out and protect these dying languages as much as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | ctbx312 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Albert Armin | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | hnhung | 73 | view |
- The use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 73
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Another reason is that if citizens in A have expert more than 2 languages instea...
^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: C
...s which have been existed around 2600 B.C to find the keys to explain this civili...
^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...he decline of others is both a positive as well as a negative development. However, I beli...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92666666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78770315652 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1185650257 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.692307692 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9230769231 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210438774628 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075273236333 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867467522758 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135033158478 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703418102866 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.