Fewer students are studying science at school and university, favouring more computer-based subjects instead.
Is this a positive or negative development? What are the reasons for this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your
knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words
The invention of computers, coupled with the emergence of the Internet, science subjects at school and university have been superseded by computer-based subjects over the past few decades. Even though this development is deleterious to a certain extent, I believe that it could be considered beneficial for a number of reasons.
The prevalence of choosing disciplines associated with computers can be a wondrous alternative for scholars in their acquisition of knowledge and degrees. First and foremost, the driving force behind this trend is the convenience and multifunction of computers, which assist students to complete a wide range of tasks and make young pupils more likely to be creative. The great flexibility offered through this type of subjects means that students can access the lessons and manage their own pace of learning, which is a possible measure for them to keep track of their routine and make plans to accomplish their academic diploma. Furthermore, in the competitive market today, computer literacy is an indispensable element for most graduates to compete for job opportunities, career progression, higher salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life.
For a variety of reasons, computer-based subjects would gradually take over the scientific subjects. The first reason why fewer students choose science as their major is that science subjects are sophisticated, which requires students to put much effort in their study. Indeed, these subjects namely Math, Biology, or Chemistry consist of a wide array of specialized knowledge and have fewer practical applications later in life. Secondly, from the employment point of view, science-related occupations are probably limited, perhaps science subjects seem to be less attractive for students compared to computer-based subjects.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the increase in subjects linking to using computers will have beneficial effects on students, and this development will be perpetuated. As a result, I think the government should invest in cutting-edge technology in educational institutions to guarantee the holistic development of students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-24 | huyen002 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | huyen002 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-13 | Phạm Minh Quang | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 82 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | Trần Khôi Nguyên | 56 | view |
- Task 2 Fewer students are studying science at school and university favouring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for that Give reason for your answer and include any relevant example from y 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favouring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your k 73
- Fewer students are studying science at school and university favouring more computer based subjects instead Is this a positive or negative development What are the reasons for this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your k 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...computers, coupled with the emergence of the Internet, science subjects at school...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted. As a result, I think the government should invest in cutting-edge technology...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69565217391 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20889667362 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.8360543311 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.833333333 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288145826998 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987892558025 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453569434622 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165768149989 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565786464151 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.