Space research scientists are researching for life on the moon and other planets by putting their efforts because it is often argued that life on earth is becoming threatening to individuals day-by-day for maintaining humankind. In my opinion, I firmly disagree with this notion.
There are multiple changes in today's lifestyle because of the astronauts who had discovered places for research to sustain life.
First and foremost, the creation of new GEO-satellites that predict the global weather around our planet. Secondly, the innovations of new technologies may have helped space researchers in finding information about the universe which was unknown till 1950. However, so far, we have studied and learned only three percent about space with only basic information. Therefore, instead of researching more in outer space, scientists could focus more on finding alternative ways to sustain life on Earth for homosapiens.
Moreover, walking on the moon and other planets require huge investments. Millions of dollars are spent on rockets and other equipment in sending an astronaut to study outer space. Additionally, it is unsure that they will find something useful. Consequently, billions of people are dying due to starvation because the government has insufficient funds to support their citizens for food. Hence, instead of spending money on these journeys, more focus should be on alleviating new solutions to manage life on earth as not everyone can manage the cost of living on other planets.
In conclusion, life foundation researchers keep continuing the research in outer space but should put more focus on finding other methods of survival for humans on mother earth.
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people a better education Do you agree or disagree 56
- Should private schools receive government funding Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- In the future it may be necessary for us to live on other planets For this reason some people believe that we should spend money now to research other planets such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- You have just received a credit card statement from your bank The statement lists a number of expensive purchases that you are sure you did not make Write a letter to the bank manager In the letter Introduce yourself Explain that you did not buy the items 73
- You have lost something on a bus and called customer service to get help You weren t happy with their response Write a letter to the bus company manager In your letter you should describe the item you lost explain why you weren t happy with the customer s 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered places for research to sustain life First and foremost the creation of new G...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ustain life on Earth for homosapiens Moreover walking on the moon and other planets r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...funds to support their citizens for food Hence instead of spending money on these...
^^
Line 6, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nage the cost of living on other planets In conclusion life foundation researcher...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33460076046 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77494130875 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 263.0 20.2975951904 1296% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1403.0 106.682146367 1315% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 263.0 20.7667163134 1266% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 122.0 7.06120827912 1728% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0951354284482 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951354284482 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520118761125 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192400725389 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 135.2 13.0946893788 1032% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -203.93 50.2224549098 -406% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 107.0 11.3001002004 947% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.11 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.18 8.58950901804 247% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 107.2 10.1190380762 1059% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 107.0 10.7795591182 993% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.