Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no denying that food can be produced economically due to the promoted fertilisers and the-state-of-art technology. Opinions diverge on whether these approaches take a toll on human health and do the local dwellers a great disservice. Although this statement can be justified to some certain extent , I am in opposition owing to rational reasons.
It is perceptible that chemical fertilisers not only render harm on the environment nearby but also on the consumers. Moreover, it is unethical that farmers use multiple pesticides and chemical fertilisers to boost the growth process of plants now that it becomes noxious for consumers. To be more accurate, people and animals could be affected by various diseases such as cancer , high blood pressure ,... after consuming those products. Therefore, the improvement seems to pale in comparison to the harm.
Admittedly, the utilisation of present-day technical is attributed to serious dislocations to the local residents. This can be explained by the fact that machines have already replaced most of human jobs, which is conducive to the leap of unemployment rate. Worsely, this movement also leads to the surge of crime due to poverty and unemployment for a long period. As a result, the government struggles to manage the residents' life , therefore, they have to enact some policies to encounter this tendency.
To sum up, the efforts to diminish agriculture production can render multiple adverse impacts on the consumers and the dwellers. Due to these adverse bearing, I concur that it is not a good idea to alter the production process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-26 | quan12341234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | quan12341234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Guiseppe59192 | 61 | view |
- Task 1 The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015
- Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for country development and progress To what extent do you agree or not agree 61
- The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- Young people are committing more crimes Discuss the causes and solutions for this problem 67
- Task 1 The bar chart showed the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instruments violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... can be justified to some certain extent , I am in opposition owing to rational re...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ected by various diseases such as cancer , high blood pressure ,... after consumin...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ses such as cancer , high blood pressure ,... after consuming those products. Ther...
^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
... the government struggles to manage the residents life , therefore, they have to enact so...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t struggles to manage the residents life , therefore, they have to enact some poli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29019607843 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06883021316 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619607843137 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.753514991 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3571428571 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214382042163 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584531932137 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531430284596 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112320409169 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802820783031 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.