Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion? Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Opinions diverge on whether students should take into account studying the science of food and how to anticipate it rather than spending time for the more utmost subjects. In my judgement, although both of these practices have certain merits as well as few drawbacks, I lean forward the latter owing to multiple rationales.
Admittedly, the science of food should be a part of the mandatory curriculum for every student for numerous reasons. First, being fully equipped can help children to maintain a healthy body. To be more accurate, with the knowledge about food learned in schools, children can apply it directly to their daily meals to improve its quality. For example, they can acknowledge that they have to consume more vegetables to avoid digesting diseases. Therefore, this practice contributes significantly to the overall health of children.
In contrast, I fervently advocate that children should carve out their time to delve into other paramount importance subjects. Firstly, it is not necessary for children to spend an immense amount of time studying about food. This can be explained by the fact that in the burgeoning era of technology, they can look for this valued information within the clicks. Secondly, concentrating on chief subjects can ensure children have a good future. Specifically, being adept at academic subjects can let children win a seat at top universities or being recruited for a lucrative jobs in the future.
To sum up, although an influx of people claims that students should be taught about the science of food and its preparation, I reckon that they have to focus on utmost important subjects now that its merits overshadow that of the science of food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... of these practices have certain merits as well as few drawbacks, I lean forward the latte...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'job'?
Suggestion: job
...ties or being recruited for a lucrative jobs in the future. To sum up, although a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i reckon, in contrast, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15884476534 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79653166385 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6152519892 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217851060258 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790825725798 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680344002156 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144400673277 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021163739877 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.