Formal examination are the only way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as course work and project is not a satisfactory way to do this To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Formal examination are the only way to assess a student's performance.
Continual assessment such as course work and project is not a satisfactory way to do this.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Student's performance is evaluated by the formal examinations which is the only effective way. The continuous work such as projects and course work is not a good way to evaluate the performance. I completely disagree with this statement that formal examination is the only way to determine the student performance. Formal examination are not only the way. As students may not be able to write in the examination, whatever they had understood just because they are afraid and hopeless. Next reason might be that, some students might not be able explain it orally and practically rather than giving formal examinations. So, projects work will be better for them.
At first, students now a days, focus more on practical work than in theoretical portion. When examination had to be given, they need to follow rules and regulations; which decreases their confidence level. Though they know the answer, they will not be able to write in formal examination. So, the student's performance can be evaluated through their daily work from course work and outer knowledge. For e.g. when student become sick during examination, he may not be able to write whatever he had knowledge about. Hence, it should be evaluated on daily basis not only in formal examination.
Similarly, students in this century, are liable to internets. They learn many things from there which can be presented only through the project works. Formal examinations increases fear in some students who have exam phobia. They learn various ways of presenting their work which is possible only by project work. For e.g. if project works are recommended for such students, they will be encouraged in studying, it imparts the positivity in students as well as teachers.
In conclusion, it can be clearly said that students will have more confident and focus if project work is given. And, the students should be evaluated in their daily basis. Hence, project works and course work should be encouraged rather than formal examinations.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-14 Angina 56 view
2022-08-14 Angina 56 view
Essays by user Angina :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...be better for them. At first, students now a days, focus more on practical work than in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...etter for them. At first, students now a days, focus more on practical work than in t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to write in formal examination. So, the students performance can be evaluated through th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, hence, if, may, similarly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12615384615 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78635729623 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458461538462 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8355254564 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.3333333333 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4761904762 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268182601468 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116487077573 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10544611787 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194887847868 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100608378929 0.056905535591 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...be better for them. At first, students now a days, focus more on practical work than in t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...etter for them. At first, students now a days, focus more on practical work than in t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to write in formal examination. So, the students performance can be evaluated through th...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, hence, if, may, similarly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12615384615 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78635729623 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458461538462 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8355254564 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.3333333333 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4761904762 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268182601468 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116487077573 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10544611787 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194887847868 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100608378929 0.056905535591 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.