Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend is a positive or negative development

For many years, fossil fuels have been utilized by the majority of nations. But recently the idea of using substitutes to these sources is being promoted by many. This is definitely a beneficial advancement and this essay provides the reasons for this perception.

To embark on, fossil fuels are a major source for power generation these days but these are on the verge of extinction. Since these have become scarce, their costs are sky-high which adds a burden on the consumers in the form of increased taxes and prices. As an illustration, citizens of many countries are already complaining about the heavy increments in the electricity and cooking gas prices. Also, the burning of fossil fuels constitutes pollution. The byproducts of their combustion are toxic and pose a threat to the environment and human wellbeing. For instance, many environmental organizations are running campaigns regarding the damage caused to the environment due to these fuels. Hence there are some adverse outcomes, it is obvious that there is a necessity to replace the current sources with alternatives.

In this regard, solar and wind power are perfect substitutes. As they are renewable sources of energy their extinction is out of the question and the difficulty in finding these sources is absolutely zero since they are available all over the globe. For instance, consider solar energy, all one needs to do is set up solar panels on the roof and the house is powered up. Moreover, these are extremely eco-friendly. These sources never produce any hazardous substances and thus helps in the reduction of pollution effectively. It is a fact that the countries that employed solar power have milder degrees of pollution. As a result, the costs will come down remarkably, and affordability increases along with safeguarding the eco systems.

In conclusion, although many parts of the world are powered by fossil fuels, their availability has been quite low. Hence, it is extremely important to switch to solar and wind energy which are both abundant and cost-effective.

Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
For many years fossil fuels have been utilized by the ...
Line 3, column 810, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ce the current sources with alternatives In this regard solar and wind power are...
Line 5, column 608, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...r power have milder degrees of pollution As a result the costs will come down rem...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1021021021 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80456043845 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51951951952 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 333.0 20.2975951904 1641% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1699.0 106.682146367 1593% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 333.0 20.7667163134 1604% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 99.0 7.06120827912 1402% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265040138307 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265040138307 0.084324248473 314% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163872522678 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199133781091 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 169.1 13.0946893788 1291% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -274.98 50.2224549098 -548% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 134.3 11.3001002004 1188% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.78 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.37 8.58950901804 284% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 9.78957915832 603% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 135.2 10.1190380762 1336% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 59.0 10.7795591182 547% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.