In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages ?
In the future, all vehicles will be autonomous and passengers will be the only person inside these means of transportation. Despite some benefits of it, I believe that overall the drawbacks are more significant.
Admittedly, self-driving cars have several positive impacts. Firstly, it will contribute to reducing operating expenses. Transportation businesses will no longer have to hire drivers who account for nearly 50% spending. As a result, huge salary payment can be eliminated. Secondly, when enterprises do not have to pay the employee salary, they can spend more money on investing on the quality of service and vehicles as well. This lead to attracting the great number of customers and building credibility and reputation that are vital to the sustainable development of a company.
However, the above benefits are negated by the following problems. First, autonomous vehicles cause rising unemployment of thousands of drivers. There are many people make living by driving, so when this job is redundant, they are forced to quit their job and find another one in completely new field. The second disadvantage of this trend is the fact that an autonomous vehicle can replace human when it comes to unexpected situation. It is seen that an autonomous vehicle is installed in advance and follow certain instruction on a road. Sometimes, an urgent problem can happened, however, it can not solve the problem quickly, actively, and efficiently as human beings. This can results in passengers’s health and even worse their lives.
In conclusion, I believe that the benefits of self-driving vehicles are outweighed by its drawbacks. These kind of vehicles can develop if it is designed to assure the safety and employment for citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...ssengers will be the only person inside these means of transportation. Despite some benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...d efficiently as human beings. This can results in passengers’s health and even worse t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...hicles are outweighed by its drawbacks. These kind of vehicles can develop if it is design...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30685920578 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03505135164 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1979784505 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4705882353 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235650633722 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687886818181 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982109613899 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162805554189 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100453910837 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.