In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree Some people argue that living on earth is becoming

In our solar system, the only planet which sustains life is our planet, Earth. Nowadays more and more people argue that more finance should be diverted for space exploration and establishing life at Mars. I strongly disagree with this statement and will put forward my views regarding the same.

Many think tanks are persuing government and non government agencies to pump in more and more money in research in view of making life sustainable at other planets. For instance, Ellon musk and Jeff are investing huge amount of money in space exploration. The space shuttle they made could not become a huge success and thus leading to a huge financial loss. Similarly if these adventures will be carried on then this will be a wastage of money in a part of person in particular and to public in general.

On the other hand, we should utilise this money for the betterment of Earth by controlling the factors which are making life difficult on this planet. These two main problems are environment pollution and population control. Big corporates and the concerned ruling parties of every country should spread an awareness among inhabitants to control air, noise and water pollution by educating them. People should be educated about various population control measures. Perhaps, if we could put our finances for making people aware on these topics, we can make our earth a better place to live in and can save enough money.

In conclusion, I would like to assert that it is better to distribute funds for making people more responsibilities for their duties towards earth, than to divulge money towards these space adventures.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... thus leading to a huge financial loss. Similarly if these adventures will be carried on ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in particular, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01102941176 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6294116619 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4364845097 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.846153846 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276616135639 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088918643713 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631870664831 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160500760097 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418095132087 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.