In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is predicted that in the future, people can hardly live on the Earth because of climate change, pollution, and depletion of various resources. Consequently, several people suppose that governments and organizations should mobilize more funds on astronomy, especially researching livable planets such as Mars and how to approach these. Personally, I agree that investment in other inhabitable planets is necessary for human evolution, however, I reckon that we should tackle our Earth’s problems together instead of destroying planet to planet in the whole universe.
On the one hand, spending more money on researching another planet for humans to inhabit seems to be significant. Firstly, finding another livable planet means we can be exposed to another civilization. As a result, it will answer our most profound and thought-provoking question: “Are we alone in the universe?” For example, the first American spacecraft landed on Mars ushering humans in an entirely new journey of conquering outer space. Secondly, researching other habitable entities also guarantees the future of our next generations. In the worse circumstance, if our planet is devastated, our offspring will have another shelter where they can learn about their ancestors’ history as well as develop their own civilization.
On the other hand, it seems more practical to me that we should utilize these funds on handling our Earth’s issues in order to live stably and spend precisely. First and foremost, together, we can solve more than 70-80% of the world’s problems, as soon as all of them are tackled, we might never have to leave our planet. Global warming is mainly caused by human activities such as manufacturing and driving. Hence, governments and companies should invest in environmental-friendly ways of producing and commuting like technology-based systems or using bikes and solar-power cars instead. One possible solution for pollutions is for everyone to join hands, from the most negligible action as reusing recyclable things to a greater one as spending more money on a more modern and effective waste treatment system. In terms of resources’ depletion, the cash flow used for astronaut research should be invested for finding and applying methods of alternative and eternal resources such as solar and wind energy. Otherwise, the amount of money spent on finding new planets can be unaffordable to many nations, thus, this money must be used for sustainable development.
In conclusion, I agree that funding for studies on habitable planets is necessary because it helps human to know more outside the horizon and also prepare our descendants for a secure future. However, I believe that investments in dealing with the Earth’s problems are much more practical and rational.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 87
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4183908046 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10594535556 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2256087837 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.647058824 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5882352941 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5294117647 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29889386974 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964706707502 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582957885943 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183035124461 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470558142504 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.