One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that money should be shell out on finding other planets because human will not be able to stay on earth in future because rise in global warming and other dangerous conditions will make human life impossible on earth. In my opinion this apprehension seems to be more rational this essay will further elaborate my views in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with there are deluges of arguments in favour of money should be spend on researches to find another planet like mars for mankind because earth will be no longer suitable for human habitat. The most preponderant one is that global warming to elaborate it due to the rise in population. Environment pollution is increased at high level. Carbon emission, CFC and many more other gases are affecting global warming. Due to these soaring problem a sudden increase is detected in global warming. For instance the study results published by the World health Organisation in March 2021 and April 2022 clearly indicates that in next 80 years the earth will no longer be suitable place for human habitat. In order to face this biggest problem men should be shell out in finding other planets. Hence, it is crucial and critical for the upcoming life of mankind.
Furthermore another pivotal aspect of above aforementioned is only likely to help in one excel and thrive in varied areas such as ozone layer damaged. This is because in modern era the biggest problem is wholes in ozone layer. The main reason why this is happening cause human activities. It not only spread skin cancer but also leads to various other problems for humans. Due to that if anyone comes in ultra violate raises that come across from the wholes that are present in ozone layers, will cause skin cancer for humans. This is increasing day why day. If ozone layer will be destroyed there will not be any life on planet earth. Hence, it is clear why money should be spent on research for other planets such as Mars and so on. Only then can be mankind will be saved. That is why many people consider it as positive development.
On the other hand a section of society contradicts above aforementioned by providing reliable justification they claim that technology advancement. To make it justifiable in today's world there multiple new method that has been implemented in order to make planet earth safe for mankind. For example the invention of electric cars are helping to reduce pollution. There are multifarious invention that took place in recent years. It will help to maintain everything in balance there is no need to spend money on research for finding planets instead they must spend money on other methods and sectors that helping to reduce pollution level. Hence, it is clear why many people consider spending money on research in order to find another planet for humans is totally a wastage of money.
To conclude having pondered over above stated it is crystal clear that spending money on researches in order to find another planet such as Mars for human habitat are indeed too great.
- Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Do you agree or disagree 56
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- In most of the societies the role of mother and father differs what are the causes of this difference what will be the parental roles in future 67
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
... arguments in favour of money should be spend on researches to find another planet li...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...al for the upcoming life of mankind. Furthermore another pivotal aspect of above aforeme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to that if anyone comes in ultra violate raises that come across from the wholes ...
^^
Line 5, column 561, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...humans. This is increasing day why day. If ozone layer will be destroyed there wil...
^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in order to find another planet such as Mars for human habitat are indeed too gr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 13.1623246493 266% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 41.998997996 186% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2599.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 534.0 315.596192385 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8670411985 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49749906468 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455056179775 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 823.5 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3290080033 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2592592593 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18518518519 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243626082284 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661877422733 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733322622582 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151282777182 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560010103913 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.