due to increased pollution and rapidly diminishing natural resources, it is becoming more and more difficult to sustain life on Earth. So, to tackle this issue some people think that researches, which aim at finding other possible planets to live should be profoundly funded. I agree that pouring money in this type of researches might pay us in the future; however, keeping the current situation in mind, it will be better if money is spent to improve the condition of Earth and the people that live here.
There are far more pressing matters which need the attention and money rather than the research regarding possibility of living on another planet. One of the biggest problems prevailing accross the whole world is poverty. Many under-privileged people, living in developing countries, are deprived of food and other basic necessities such as shelter, healthcare and education. Money should be spent on improving the condition of these less fortunate people instead of spending it on research on other planets. Apart from this, there are other fields of science which can be used to recover Earth itself. For example, if a convinient source of renewable energy is invented, it can reduce the amount of air pollution caused by the combustion of fossil fuels( coal, petroleum). Similarly, more effective methods of purifying water might be found if enough money, time and endeavours are put into it. Thus, these matters should be given priority over the the search of life in the solar system.
In addition, it is not gaurranteed that the study of other planets will pay off. The conditions on other planets are far more harsh and unfavourable as compared to the Earth; on some planets the temprature is too cold while on others there is scorching heat. Most of the planets even lack an atmosphere that has all the basic components which are required for the survival of living organisms. Even if humans manage to make it possible to live on another planet, they would not be able to sustain there for long, because the sustainability of humans, or any organism for that matter, requires the participation of uncountable other species of animals, insects, plants and micro-organisms. it would be near impossible to recreate the environment that is found on the Earth. Morover, given what humans have done to Earth, it would not be wrong to say that the newly found home planet will face the same end as Earth may one day face. Hence, the money spent on this type of research has suge chances of going in vain.
In conclusion, before attempting at finding some other planet that humans can call their home, more attention should be given to the matters at hand such as poverty and the development of under-developed countries. Extravagent spending on outer space research should be avoided as it has very less probability of being useful to humans.
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree Some people argue that living on earth is becoming 82
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, it creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Nowadays a lot of people in college are doing academic study we should encourage them do learn vocational skills like plumbers and electricians Do you agree or disagree 79
- Many feel that going to the gym is the best way to stay fit Others think there are more effective methods 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
due to increased pollution and rapidly dimi...
^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...untries, are deprived of food and other basic necessities such as shelter, healthcare and educati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re are other fields of science which can be used to recover Earth itself. For exa...
^^
Line 3, column 901, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me and endeavours are put into it. Thus, these matters should be given priority o...
^^
Line 3, column 947, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e matters should be given priority over the the search of life in the solar system. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 947, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e matters should be given priority over the the search of life in the solar system. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...s, insects, plants and micro-organisms. it would be near impossible to recreate th...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ability of being useful to humans.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 480.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96875 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70598536042 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5852315192 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454284644153 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124754161658 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720569981654 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293207162996 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910133698175 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.