In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to our actions against our planet's health, its ability to sustain life is deteriorating rapidly. Against such pressing matters, a common consensus is to search for additional lands and materials, in order to counteract. In my opinion, however, while I agree with the need for humanity to expand to outer space, abandoning our home planet is not a valid reason for it, for reasons found in the following paragraphs.
The expansion of mankind into the void above is inevitable. As civilization develops, various social issues will arise, requiring appropriate responses to resolve. For instance, with the prolific birthrate and growing life expectancies enabled by technological advancements, the global population has exploded exponentially, leading to tightening living quarters as cities find themselves becoming increasingly populated. Moreover, over-exploitation on account of short-term benefits means many crucial resources and life necessities are greatly diminished, disabling support for such numbers of inhabitants. Because of these reasons, heavier emphasis will be required on the development of technology for outer space.
However, while the cruciality of space exploration cannot be stressed enough, the same thing could be said about protecting the planet's habitats. First and foremost, even though the view of intergalactic human civilization is compelling, it should be noted that the costs and requirements for such progress are tremendously massive, well over the capabilities of our current technological prowess, which is also currently hindered by a multitude of social problems. Hence, we should prioritize funding and research into solutions for these setbacks prior to any space studies. Additionally, even if we can find another suitable location for humankind, this will not solve the root of the problem, as sooner or later, we will also exhaust its resources. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for us to achieve environmental sustainability so as to ensure our well-being for generations to come.
In conclusion, while the need for studies in the space industry is irrefutable, society should not overlook the significance of preserving their mother planet.
- Some people believe citizens should be allowed to carry handguns in order to protect themselves while others think this can lead to many social security problems in the society What s your opinion 92
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What form do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones 92
- The time people devote to the job leaves very little time for personal life How widespread is the problem What problem will this shortage of time cause 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...to achieve environmental sustainability so as to ensure our well-being for generations t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6990881459 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24648519409 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650455927052 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8425766352 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824227535642 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290773350365 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.019802769663 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513596161345 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118822912212 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...to achieve environmental sustainability so as to ensure our well-being for generations t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6990881459 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24648519409 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650455927052 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8425766352 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.928571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0824227535642 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290773350365 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.019802769663 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513596161345 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118822912212 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.