In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, many people are questioning whether the disappearance of printed materials can be possible somewhere in the future due to the availability of online books or newspapers. Personally, I am partly in favor of this viewpoint for the following reasons.
On the one hand, accessing resources on the Internet platform facilitates readers in terms of time and financial matters. Firstly, online newspapers satisfy the user’s demand for instantly updating news around the world. This is an advantage over the lengthened processing, including gathering, editing, and publishing, of printed newspapers, which makes them harder to reach a wide range of readers in a short period of time. Another point is that people are able to read everything, from luxurious magazines to best-selling novels, on the Internet without sparing any money. As a result, readers of different backgrounds can access to the giant knowledge source of humankind. To illustrate, the Internet enables me, a bookworm, to read many masterpieces, such as Gone with the wind or Think and grow rich, which are literally pricey.
On the other hand, I believe that printed newspapers and books are hardly irreplaceable since they play an indispensable role in our culture and bring about health benefits. Thousands of years ago, our ancestors tried to pass on their knowledge to later offspring in ancient books, which are still of great significance until now but can be hardly found on the Internet. These books are part of each nation’s identity, lessoning children the national pride and patriotism. Furthermore, holding a newspaper on hand is beneficial to our eyes, and reduces any harms that computers or smartphones cause to our bodies. This can be proved by a finding that in the era of technology, far more students suffer from damaged eyesight than in the past when they used to be more familiar with only paper coursebooks.
In summary, online newspapers or printed ones are equally important to the development of society, but the volume of those publications seems to decrease somewhat in the foreseen future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problem 84
- 11
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...each a wide range of readers in a short period of time. Another point is that people are able ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, still, then, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23145400593 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95538533774 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614243323442 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5510512207 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.928571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178591171084 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507803008755 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380654323628 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977777405859 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222093698366 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.