In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative development?

Unprecedented increase in senior population have been a striking problem in the 21st century. I believe this is a negative development which place an enormous burden on society.

A lack of work force as well as national economic stagnation could be regarded as the two major repercussions of aging population. On the economy level, a rapidly aging population means a shortage of qualified working-age people. Thus, business would struggle to fill in demands goal results in adverse consequences. These could include unproductivity, higher labour cost, and reduce international competitiveness. In some circumstances, it create a scarcity of supplys and goods which could lead to wage inflation. To illustrate, Japan has decreased in its GPA out put and productivity growth owing to senior citizens are unable to work long hours and undermine pressure.

From the federal government perspective, this development has put a stain in the country’s coffers. Specifically, The domestic revenue, not to mentioned the cut in allocating for significant fields like military force, education, and infrastructure, may find it hard to maintain considerable funds in welfare payment, social security for the elder. Hence, tax hike will be attributed to taxpayers providing fiscal imbalance. Noticeably, it could be detrimental for the nation in the long terms.

By contrast, the older can bring several benefit to the company and community regarding with lowing risk and limiting damage. With entrepreneurs, having the virtue of experienced workers, they can take advantage of which and maximize the successful rate of projects. In addition, as advisers, the aged can ultilize their potential without any concerning working-conditions. For instance, many political leaders or members of the executive are the aged due to their life-experience.

In conclusion, this phenomenon should be viewed as negative development followed by deficiency labor force and an unexpected tax raise. It is vital for the government to come up with feasible measures to tackle this issue and its possible repercussions.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-28 nguyendangquang.aspect 84 view
2023-03-03 tieuquynh 78 view
2022-09-25 Charles Le 73 view
2022-07-18 DNTMdntm 89 view
2022-04-22 vanhyeet 61 view
Essays by user DNTMdntm :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...petitiveness. In some circumstances, it create a scarcity of supplys and goods which c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e domestic revenue, not to mentioned the cut in allocating for significant fields...
^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun benefit seems to be countable; consider using: 'several benefits'.
Suggestion: several benefits
...s. By contrast, the older can bring several benefit to the company and community regarding ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essful rate of projects. In addition, as advisers, the aged can ultilize their po...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61006289308 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36023321806 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5936146492 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104097296595 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301820078215 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352937503386 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542326309973 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224114724314 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.