The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems?
Nowadays, we can observe how some individuals are getting more affluent and conversely other people are getting more broke. Consequently, this would bring issues such as a decline in the country's production and an increase in the crime rate as well. However, there are solutions to solve these problems. For instance, governments can monitor incomes more carefully. Also, they could give households monetary support to start their own business.
This phenomenon will destructively harm our society. First, as this gap gets wider than before, the more people are losing interest in doing their jobs. Plus, this would apply for both groups. As a result, there is going to be a decline in the country's production. Second, because the poor needs to provide for their families, some of them are going to take an alternative approach, which is committing a crime. Unfortunately, this would on;y exacerbate the situation even further.
Some actions need to be taken by governments to prevent these issues from happening. One of the crucial steps is to monitor the incomes of the household more seriously in order to normalize these incomes by getting a reasonable amount of taxes. Another beneficial action is that governments should support families at the beginning so that they could start their own business or find a suitable job for themselves.
In summary, there is no denial in the massive difference in people's earnings. Sadly, this would cause problems like damaging the production of a country and a rise in crimes. However, governments can introduce some ways to handle these problems. They need to use a more restricted policy on taxes to control people's income. Also, they have to provide a baseline budget for families to let them flourish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | mohsina | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | xbear307 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | vongocson | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | quynhan1995 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | cocolico14 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. 11
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992 2000 Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate 47
- Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little that can be done to rectify this. 61
- Many people are working at home rather than in the workplace. Some people believe this will bring benefits to the workers and their families, but others suggest it will cause stress in the home. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, well, for instance, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75506726204 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.018847021 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122171563512 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364613124312 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335814973289 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745625855491 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397614422846 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.