Science plays a very crucial role in the development of a country. Some people claim that funds for teaching science should be greater than for other subjects, which are allotted by the government, to increase the rate of development of the nation. But I totally disagree with this. I believe that other subjects are also important for the country to progress and develop. The facts of the thesis are demonstrated in upcoming paragraphs with suitable example.
To begin with, the first and foremost reason for my disagreement with the statement is because every subject has its own role to the development process. For instance, to win a cricket match, all players have to contribute equally to it. Similarly, every subject is vital for the country to develop. Each subject has its own importance, which would only be fulfilled by it. Like, arts and history gives us the knowledge of our culture and traditions. Thus, in order for a second world nation to become a first world nation, they need to prosper every subject equally as a whole.
However, science had become an essential part of a country`s development. Financing science can lead to many advancements, such as, in medical research, invention of many cures. After all, if the people of the country is in good health , they ill ultimately work more efficiently and contribute for country. In addition, improvement in science subjects like technology and mathematics makes our livelihood comfortable and make infrastructure better of the country.
In conclusion, scientific advancements are need of the hour. But in order for a country to evolve, other subjects should be invested equally to it. As, no nation can progress only on the wings of science.
- Childhood obesity is becoming a problem throughout the developed world Because of this some people think that adverts for fast food sweets and sugary snacks should not be allowed in school and college To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 93
- The governement should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The table below gives details of world electricity production by renewable sources in the four years between 2009 and 2012 79
- In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co educational or mixed schools Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single sex schools To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world However the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...ion, they need to prosper every subject equally as a whole. However, science had become...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... people of the country is in good health , they ill ultimately work more efficient...
^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...jects should be invested equally to it. As, no nation can progress only on the win...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, thus, after all, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09540636042 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90679624191 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558303886926 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5696419993 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1111111111 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7222222222 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305885182795 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924736584401 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883937087974 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188606848761 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719942974063 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.