In many parts of the world girls and boys are educated together in co-educational or mixed schools. Some people think that girls and boys benefit from being educated separately in single-sex schools. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
it is sometimes argued in every part of the world, educating boys and girls joined in a co-educational or mixed schools. Few believe, there are more opportunities as well as in career growth if they are educated in differently such as single sex schools. I do not believe dividing them into two types of school is an effective way for children.
On the one hand, mixed school has a negative impact on the educational system. Firstly, there is a misconception in public schools, female undergraduates are not allowed to play in the sporting events. For example games such as, football, basket ball is only for boys. Therefore, it was an assumption by female undergraduates they are dominated by male counterparts if studied together. Secondly, children of their age easily fall in love and spoil their career. For instance, when I was in my eighth standard, a girl aborted twice, In contrast when studied in single sex schools such circumstances may not arise. As a result, students studying in single-sex schools are more benefitted than mixed schools education.
On the other hand, co-education helps students to excel in their careers. In mixed schools as they study together can benefit both in future.children can talk to each other and solve their problems together. Participation in debates, help each other in future. For example, the working culture in a corporate environment is as a team. These schools help them working together, where as, in contrast children in single-sex schools will help to work in such environment.
To Conclude, though there are positive impacts in single-sex schools for female compared to male. mixed schools would help children to do better in future. I believe in the disadvantages outweigh advantages in this scenario.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is sometimes argued in every part of th...
^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trast when studied in single sex schools such circumstances may not arise. As a r...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...as they study together can benefit both in future.children can talk to each other and sol...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n can talk to each other and solve their problems together. Participation in deba...
^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rticipation in debates, help each other in future. For example, the working culture in a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to work' or 'work'.
Suggestion: to work; work
...t is as a team. These schools help them working together, where as, in contrast childre...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ese schools help them working together, where as, in contrast children in single-sex sch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will help to work in such environment. To Conclude, though there are positive i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Mixed
...x schools for female compared to male. mixed schools would help children to do bette...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...chools would help children to do better in future. I believe in the disadvantages outweig...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13888888889 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00536428843 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7601523294 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2222222222 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29573727586 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920124218158 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100375102958 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196205950199 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082846852727 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.