Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement??
It is argued that spendings on the arts such as music, cinema is waste of money and government should invest a huge amount of money in public services instead. Although I agree that spendings on public services such health, education is crucial, investment in the arts do not waste too much money.
On top of that, it is undeniable that investment in public services is vital because they will determine the quality of citizen’s life in each nation. To be more specific, If governments take more care of medical system in their countries, inhabitant’s health will be upgraded and improved. Moreover, development of each nation mostly depend on education. Therefore, If education is invested adequately, economy’s countries will evovle thrivingly. Contrastly, governments allocate deficiently for public services, which can lead to a large amount of social problems such as conflicts between the rich and the poor, calamities, poverty or even wars.
However, this does not mean that the arts should be entirely neglected. Firstly, the arts symbolize for the culture and the spirit of each nation in the world. Thanks to unique culture of nations, their lifestyle and customs seem to be reflected and especially, tourists from other nations can be attracted by them. And gradually tourism stands a higher chance of developing. For example, In Viet Nam , Bac Ninh province, Dong Ho paintings are well-known all around the world, which will promote VietNam’s cultures to other countries. Secondly, unlike the science required about logic and complexity, the arts tend to stimulate creativity and imagination. It means that humans need to observe and imagine to create aesthetic products such as paintings, music, therefore, cognitive human would be enhanced through the arts.
In conclusion, investment in public services would br crucial, however, the importance of the arts on human’s life cannot be neglected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | hanhkatori2402 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | thuhuyen29042006 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Huonglando1710 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation is crucial, investment in the arts do not waste too much money. On top of ...
^^
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will be upgraded and improved. Moreover, development of each nation mostly depend...
^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of developing. For example, In Viet Nam , Bac Ninh province, Dong Ho paintings ar...
^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine creating'.
Suggestion: imagine creating
...t means that humans need to observe and imagine to create aesthetic products such as paintings, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36754966887 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88863919586 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602649006623 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9859596556 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.066666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292524314351 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928280972731 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125101016432 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200445485703 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166031239165 0.056905535591 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.