The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Rational distribution of government budget without disregarding any field has always been a very controversial issue. An opinion exists that the state should fund the sphere of art while some people claim that public infrastructure is to be more essential. Although the development of the spiritual sphere is crucial, the communitive facilities should be primary for any state.
On the one hand, the arts sphere requires the support to preserve the unique national character. Globalization leads to the unification of all life’s aspects and neglecting the national financing of cinematography, literature may results in losing the distinctive cultural and ethnic basis of the nation .For example, today Russia and Poland provide special programs that subsidy historically related films as a priority area of art. Thereby, the state should not discount the field of art, which is crucial for maintaining historical memory and projecting the image of the land on the international scene.
On the other hand, a country is to bankroll the sphere of public services as the very guarantee of its prosperity. A decent road frame contributes to the establishment of a well-functioning urban transportation system and the recreational scope’s promotion as develops the road logistics. Backing the public infrastructure ensures the formation of a sustainably running scheme, which responds promptly to citizens' requests through an effective police and fire service. For instance, a study conducted by the influential publishing house “Economics today” emerges that the nation’s economic attractiveness derives directly from the percentage of government funding of the state services sector. Thus, prioritizing the issue of funding precisely the communitive facilities contributes to the country's wealth by increasing its economic performance.
To summarize, the government is to approach to financing of fields in a responsible manner for both arts and the area of public services are of a great importance. To my mind, the state should still focus more on governmental provisions as it simplifies the public’s daily routine and fosters the power’s flourish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | ZAINBM | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Kaur_Aman | 67 | view |
- Everyone deserves to be educated It s unfair that intelligent people are not admitted to private universities because of their financial background University education should be free for everyone Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if nece 78
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
- Studying art in school improves students performance in other subjects because it is easier for multi skilled students to learn new things That s why art should be obligatory in schools Do you agree or disagree 89
- It is more important to have a good family than to have friends Family can always compensate for absence of friendship To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re is to be more essential. Although the development of the spiritual sphere is c...
^^
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...ry for any state. On the one hand, the arts sphere requires the support to preserve...
^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... cultural and ethnic basis of the nation .For example, today Russia and Poland pro...
^^
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ultural and ethnic basis of the nation .For example, today Russia and Poland provid...
^^^
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the field of art, which is crucial for maintaining historical memory and proj...
^^
Line 2, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f art, which is crucial for maintaining historical memory and projecting the ima...
^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...tage of government funding of the state services sector. Thus, prioritizing the issue of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a responsible manner" with adverb for "responsible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t is to approach to financing of fields in a responsible manner for both arts and the area of public se...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65030674847 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28985406201 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2553736954 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.692307692 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146661830736 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525107594609 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383577593461 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936205405896 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327053807369 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.