Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for the country's development and progress. To what extent do you agree or not agree.
It is appreciated that the governor should allocate more to teaching science-based subjects compared to others for the sake of national development and progress. From my perspective, I completely agree with this opinion. This essay would pen down valid justifications behind my verdict.
Initially, I opine that spending the public purse on science lessons would exert a positive impact on students’ cognitive development and logical thinking, thus contributing to a better future workforce. This is mainly derived from the fact that science subjects often require learners to do complicated calculations and explain complex processes, which sharpens their minds and boost the speed of reactions to the surrounding environment. As a result, students learning science-based subjects would possess indispensable traits to be in the labour force and devote to the national prosperity.
Besides, I hold a strong belief that teaching science subjects should be governmentally funded more as they are the basis of technological development, which is the driving force of many important industries. This is mainly due to the fact that technology is wholly developed from basic science, such as maths and biology. For example, Python, a well-known programming language is based on a host of algorithms. Therefore, pouring governmental funds into teaching science-based subjects would do wonders for industrial development in particular and national development in general.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, I concur that the country leaders should invest more in teaching science-based subjects to benefit the national development and progress as these subjects would nurture a potential workforce and contribute to developing imperative industries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-01 | lennie.butera | 61 | view |
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity What are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity What solutions can you suggest 89
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ts should be governmentally funded more as they are the basis of technological dev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87644787645 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32902729677 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583011583012 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1401828774 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.363636364 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334477605725 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121039467238 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104948266671 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218835710793 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677670138448 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.