Government should not give international aid since they have disadvantaged people like unemployed and homeless in their own country. Agree or disagree?
Some ideals debated that international aid is not worthy essential to assistants by one country to another, namely, the developed country gives donates or raised budget investment with other countries with fewer capabilities. Due to implementing this and, many others suppose that it is related to causing jobless and homeless in their own country. Looking from an overall perspective, foreign aid seemed a positive trade that would be considerably gained from impoverished countries and it should be encouraged.
It is not denied that most aids are directly approached to the developed countries or poverty countries are being conducted the meaning of national. What is meant is that is a manner to resources exploit and obtained from commercial compromises. In other words, Asia areas have the highest proportion of young labours which could become precious land for investing in these countries. Many multinational companies are constructed in Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, that is cooperative in win-win situations for the reason that are paying salary less than what they have given payroll for their own country's employees.
In addition, in emerging trends of disease or natural calamities, mutually-aid help is more than ever needed. Indeed, the Covid-19 pandemic has been spread out to many nations, leading to the financial crisis, supply of food, and unemployment raised during the 2 periods, from 2019 to 2021, and it will be continuing in the years later. At that time, foreign aid clearly plays a key role in providing medical care and supplies about healthcare systems, vaccines, the financial funds that all countries are sought. As consequence, this also is building good relations with other countries.
In conclusion, giving international aid are also prompt to economic mutual that shown on humanitarian in human beings. Some of the problems have existed in own country which it should be not taken into consideration in compared to international aids.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-11 | TranMinhDuc | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 82
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The picture below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... shown on humanitarian in human beings. Some of the problems have existed in own country wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38834951456 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94718435515 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62783171521 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9702240166 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.076923077 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24648443371 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763890363264 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553486584771 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151434914752 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615240815019 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... shown on humanitarian in human beings. Some of the problems have existed in own country wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38834951456 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94718435515 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62783171521 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9702240166 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.076923077 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24648443371 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763890363264 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553486584771 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151434914752 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615240815019 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.