In many countries today there are many highly qualified without employment.
What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it?
There are many talented people in the world today, but they are unemployed in many parts of the world. In my opinion, the reason for this situation is that they do not find a suitable company for them, and we can tackle this by suggesting the government open more workshops about employment.
The driver why people with high qualifications have not had a job yet is that the work environment is not suitable for them to trigger their love for their major. Many people work in a company that involves their major, they are fully dedicated to their work but are unrecognized. The boss does not see the benefits they bring to the company and does not realize their strength. Those people can not advance in their careers, so they stop working. For example, there are various students who choose to study abroad and then stay in that country to work because, at the workplace, they can delight in their creativity, get a high salary, and afford their personal lives.
In my view, the solution to this phenomenon is that companies should be encouraged by the government to open more workshops about orientation for employment. There are a large number of people who have a high-level of education, but they do not know what their personal strengths are or which major would be suitable in which organization. By opening workshops for people, especially for the youngsters, they can gain knowledge and recognize their strengths, and the result is that they could find a company that is worthy.
In conclusion, I believe the important reason for this situation is that people are not oriented about which company would be satisfactory, and organizations should create more workrooms to share their experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | vanhhoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | duongpt | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | Afdalah Harris | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | Phatle20010807 | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | HappyCandy | 89 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food in grams per week in the UK from 1970 to 1990 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 73
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population of four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...salary, and afford their personal lives. In my view, the solution to this phenome...
^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t orientation for employment. There are a large number of people who have a high-level of educati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9169550173 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72655577467 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480968858131 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.0429057089 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.1 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167335190707 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751425967379 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494233902354 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123268627462 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464881128662 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.