Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
It is true that some people say government ought to allocate more of their budget to rail than roadways. While I agree that railway system should be invested more money to develop, I believe there are some important factors need to be taken into account before building this system.
On the one hand, there are many advantages we can see from railway transport. First of all, it is an efficient transport system that allow us to commute over long distances faster than road transport. In Japan, a high speed train can obtain a speed of 240 km/h, which is three times faster than a car. As a result, travel time to work is reduced, people has more time to rest and relax. Furthermore, locomotives tend to be less harmful to the environment than cars because nowadays electricity becomes the major energy source of subway trains. Because of that, the consumption of fossil fuel may reduce significantly and less amount of carbon emissions is released into the air.
On the other hand, railway transport has certainly serious limitation. One major problems is the cost of construction, maintenance and overhead expenses are very expensive compared to roadways. For many developing countries, if there are no careful consideration and highly supported funding from other rich countries, this may be difficult to accomplish. For example, Saigon’s first metro in Vietnam has faced seven times delays due to the lack of funding from the central government. Also, railway transport is unsuitable and uneconomical for short distance and small traffic of goods as roadways.
In conclusion, although trains seem to be faster and more environmentally friendly, the economic efficiency need to be examine before deciding choose one of two transport: rail or roadways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-04 | BuiGiaHan | 89 | view |
| 2024-12-04 | BuiGiaHan | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17770034843 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.842394159 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3083357216 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119329866752 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391940779184 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399145648918 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699608722684 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617329101435 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.