governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. to what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this modern world in order to build immune ways for citizens, governments ought to spend money on construction of them. I believe it is crucial that they advocate budgets for roads and railways fairly because both of them play significant role in people's daily activities.
Due to several reasons it is vital that governments construct for people of their societies. Not all people are interested in using trains and they usually prefer to take taxi and in the wake of inappropriate condition of roads a great number of car accidents take place all around the world so a perfect and safe road could decline the number of accidents considerably and as a result the health of passengers' will be guaranteed. Moreover by creating standard roads, pedestrians could pass ways without being injured or passing away.
On the other hand, a high number of commuters prefer to use metro or trains to travel long distances due to their safety and speed not to mention cost. It is the duty of governments to satisfy people by building high-tech railways. For instance, japan has built super-fast trains which could travel by the speed of more than 300 kilometer per hour.
To sum up, from my point of view political men should spend budgets to build various types of ways and it is not cogent to pay for just one of them. I hope in the future governments with the help of young knowledgeable experts could prevent accidences by building standard ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | vantran2297 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | cocolico14 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | ThuBella | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | ThuBella | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Bejchekkx | 73 | view |
- some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. discuss both views and give your opinio 61
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. to what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal.some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. discuss both views and give your own opinion, 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cars'?
Suggestion: cars
...te condition of roads a great number of car accidents take place all around the wor...
^^^
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ealth of passengers will be guaranteed. Moreover by creating standard roads, pedestrians...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...commuters prefer to use metro or trains to travel long distances due to their safety and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...ld travel by the speed of more than 300 kilometer per hour. To sum up, from my point of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t accidences by building standard ways.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, for instance, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81124497992 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65170355611 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610441767068 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8976777548 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107829699623 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450515442182 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392113975135 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664240358213 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354005300981 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.