The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002.
The given table illustrates the rate of national consumer expenditure on three different categories namely Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Clothing/Footwear, and Leisure/Education in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey in the year 2012.
Overall, as can be seen from the table, it is clear that populations in these five nations had a tendency to spend the most on Food/Drinks/Tobacco, while Leisure/Education was the category being given the least care by these countries’ citizens.
With regard to Food/Drinks/Tobacco, the rate of Turkish residents consuming this item was the highest, at approximately a third, while the figure for Ireland was slightly lower, at about 29%. Meanwhile, Food/Drink/Tobacco accounted for roughly 18,8% of the total spending of the population living in Spain. In addition, 16,36% and 15,77% were the figures for this item in Italy and Sweden respectively.
Looking at Clothing/Footwear and Leisure/Education, the proportion of consumer spending on Clothing/Footwear was the highest in Italy, at 9%, while the figure for Sweden was the lowest, at 5.4%. In terms of Leisure/Education, the percentage of expenditure in this category in Turkey was higher than in other countries, at 4.35%. By contrast, spending on this item in Spain made up the smallest proportion, at 1.98% of the total spending in this country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view | |
| 2021-09-24 | Nimasha | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The plans below show the current and future plans of the Biology School in a particular university 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- The pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 and 1991 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, third, while, in addition, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61274509804 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.99657136312 2.65546596893 151% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563725490196 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.377049141 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.125 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131407030163 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595562024577 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387272215538 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827365010641 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299746766065 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.