Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone.
Do you agree or disagree?
There are a number crucial skills that contribute for life comparing other activities. While some people argue that teach more vital abilities for life are better than those activities which are done alone, I side with those who preach over important skills to shape the future.
On the one hand, it is clear that teaching a variety of skill sets allows the students to gain their future. Furthermore, they will be sharpened about hard and soft skills; it can make them easier to understand many aspects for life. For instance, if children have already preached about crucial skills such as: critical thinking skills, patience, communication skills and many so on since they were in primary and secondary school, their teachers will be able to consider the best interest of their pupils. In order that, the kids can obtain the appropriate method.
On the other hand, the teachers could not just inform those actions which are done alone. Therefore, the pupils could not face worlds’ conditions if the bases of vital abilities did not finish yet to teach. To illustrate, when the young people do not have critical thinking skills, they can not comprehend about the projects that they will do. As a result, they get obstacles to solve the problem of life.
To sum up, more vital skills for life should be taught by group or team activities than other activities to shape their future. Because they have trained and accustomed to think critically, patience towards something happened and having good-communication skills to interact with others.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07421875 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55166045338 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59765625 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0591189518 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329300958796 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113349631564 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11111599102 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212707950415 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102900752426 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.