A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people
and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that
humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for
food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion .
Many people think that not only animals should be are protected from people but also they should be given equal rights as humans. Although animals are considered creatures with no emotions similar to humans, they are still living beasts. However, others insist that humans have the right to exploit animals to satisfy their eclectic needs, including for certain experiments studies. With regard to this matter, I strongly endorse.
In the past decades, animal cruelty has been practiced as a means to secure the safety of human products. In general, we have been employing a lot of animals for experimental products. In fact, it is true that people have used animals for trials as an object to protect human rights because we can not make various experiments on ourselves. In my opinion, the main culprit is the government in order to ensure citizen protection. For instance, they refuse the release of a product if a pharmaceutical agent does not have proven results based on their standards but the standards also, come from these require animal experiments so the vicious cycle of animal cruelty continues.
On the contrary, although we may possess higher intellect or know-how compared to animals, it does not make us more superior than them. We should not abuse an animal’s right to live or existence just to fit our convenience or just to provide pleasure to our lives. As an alternative to that, cosmetic companies should find advances in organic products since such products do not allergic reactions. Perhaps, after all, we may be wiping our very own existence without us knowing. Consequently, people do not feel guilty of killing or making experiments with animals then a possible scenario is that beasts may retaliate against man. Let’s not wait for the time for nature to perform karma.
In conclusion, exploiting animals is the most controversial issues that people like debating about. We might have a no choice at times as it is part of our culture, especially in some studies or medically related human health but we have to balance what we have built using methods that won’t harm anything or anyone because we are not the only creatures on this planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t of animals for experimental products. In fact, it is true that people have used ...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... make various experiments on ourselves. In my opinion, the main culprit is the gov...
^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...ompared to animals, it does not make us more superior than them. We should not abuse an animal&apo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, still, then, after all, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in my opinion, it is true, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68389580709 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585164835165 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.796924045 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.588235294 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5294117647 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295098306352 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912829964402 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864607810279 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187148406837 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111396079124 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.