hese days Internet-based courses have become a popular alternative to university-based courses. Some students prefer this type of learning because they do not need to attend lectures. Others argue that it is important to study at university. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Between the courses based on internet and university, which one is best for students? This moot question is relevent among members of today's internet entrenched society. Some students prefer to use internet while others prefer systematic university based curriculum; however, I believe that, instead of categorically deciding which one is the "best", students should decide on the basis of their own preference as choice between these is contingent on various factors.
Proponents of university based education system cite various reasons why internet based system will not be advantageous to students. Firstly, not only will online study distract the student from their pursuit of knowledge, but it also make students digress from topics they are intending to learn. For instance, a students who is planning to study a programming language may initially browse on Youtube for relevant information; however, the search results may not be related to his course. Furthermore, should a student be allowed to study independently in the internet, he may be too lethargic to study as only way to coerce some students is to make the learning habit compulsary. University, in other hand, precisely focus on the subjects and courses students want to partake and force students to oblige by the university curriculums in order to learn valuable lessons. Due to these reasons, many experts believe that traditional classes has far more benifits than that of autonomous online study.
However, the online study enthusiasts have different veiws in this regard. According to them, university studies provide more theoritical and less pragmatic knowledge on various topics. For instance, being purely practical subjects, most of the subjects of civil engineering course taught in university are full of facts and figures instead of practical guidelines and research. Online learning, on other hand, provide users option to navigate internet to cherrypick specific research and practical based knowledge they intend to study. This facility provides the learners flexibility in studying various subjects entailing their course of study.
In conclusion, the categorical decision regarding which of the two aforementioned mode of learning hinges upon subjective preference and what the student is intending to learn: for students who are often distracted by the internet and want intense theoritical approach of study for any subjects can opt for learning in university in systematic pattern while for people prioritizing practical study and flexibility in their course may opt for gaining knowledge from internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these is contingent on various factors. Proponents of university based education...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...their pursuit of knowledge, but it also make students digress from topics they are i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...y are intending to learn. For instance, a students who is planning to study a programming ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...nd to study. This facility provides the learners flexibility in studying various subject...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60353535354 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.936566857 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.3316778386 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.933333333 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269774049164 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991308474099 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534361899285 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173335113833 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387101320035 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.