Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that local libraries ought to invest more in paper books instead of misspending their lean resources on costly high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. However, reading e-books or watching valuable videos has numerous benefits which causes e- reading and self-education trend has become increasingly popular, I believe that paper books still the most preferred option to be chosen by different segments of society to gain both of knowledge and education.
To begin with, one of the most renowned benefits of high-tech media which offer people e-reading is that it presents convenience and costless in gaining knowledge as well as education. To illustrate, many institutions, which their main purpose based on books and similar paper materials, find it so easy to store tons of books and paper stuff on low-space disk, for that reason they can save money, especially when they are facing financial resources issues. Furthermore, many people find this way more convenient to reach books that they want to read without either putting in so much effort or paying money.
On the other hand, the physical experience of reading a paper-book, is the most likely method to practice reading. Obviously a lot of people enjoy touching a book and smell its ink while reading, and they believe and so do I that it is so enjoyable and has its special traditions. So, reading a physical book still the popular option among readers’ vast majority.
In conclusion, while new technology offers various ways that is much easier and cheaper than other traditional ways, I believe that local libraries should spend more money on printed books because they still are the first option for most of readers, in addition to spend slightly less on the other high-tech ways such as cds and dvds.
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant 59
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the readers') or simply say ''most readers''.
Suggestion: most of the readers; most readers
...use they still are the first option for most of readers, in addition to spend slightly less on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07070707071 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62879097841 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.8978932717 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.333333333 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3333333333 7.06120827912 217% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192677473631 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858201134875 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803825913168 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123284758133 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569849195676 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.