Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. Do you agree or disagree?
It’s been argued that public libraries should only be a rich source of books and not to misuse their limited funds on pricey high-tech media such as; software, videos, or DVDs. This essay supports the opposite of this suggestion, pointing out to the fact that technology is becoming a vital issue in our lives nowadays.
Public libraries are all about books, this is how many people identify public libraries with. They think that technology like computers, lap-tops, software, videos and DVDs are already exist at each home or should be provided exclusively for those who in need for them. Thus, if anyone demands the assist of high-tech media, will find it easily whether at home, or at a place designed especially for such purpose. Unlike books that are regarded as a treasure hunt by many people. Besides, there are lots of old or even ancient books inherited by different generation throughout history. They should be kept safe. Although they can just be easily restored on softwares, but for them, still a heritage. Not to mention old people who aren’t good or qualified enough to deal with technology and those who like the smell of books, enjoying holding the books in their hands at the bed or on the beach. What shall they do then? They have the right to go to public libraries and still be able to find it resourceful for all their interests. Here’s why they think public libraries shall not waste their expenses on high-tech, but rather use them for getting more and more books, references and materials.
Under other conditions, technology plays inevitably a huge role in our world today. In each and every field of life, it goes parallel with the traditional techniques. In Education, number of online classes are the same as these of face-to-face ones. For sports and health, People can exercise using machines. Even in business, enormous amount of money can be transferred from one account to another with just a click. Many other daily missions to be accomplished with the usage of technology. Therefore, when it comes to libraries, knowledge and culture, of course huge budgets must be specified for supporting them with high-tech media and software. Books are becoming old-fashioned and just an option for small category of people. On the contrary, technology is the present and the future, it’s the wide commonly choice that most of us go for.
At last, books are definitely irreplaceable for many people, but we can’t just count on them as a source of knowledge and culture. It’s been wronged that public libraries should use their limited resources providing books, and not to spend them on expensive high-tech media.
- Should animals be used in testing new drugs and procedures Gives reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 73
- Some people think that robots are important for human s future development Others think that robots have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 67
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It’s been argued that public libraries s...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vital issue in our lives nowadays. Public libraries are all about books, th...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore books, references and materials. Under other conditions, technology plays...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...monly choice that most of us go for. At last, books are definitely irreplacea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, still, then, therefore, thus, of course, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9797752809 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60596075094 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541573033708 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9618761988 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.347826087 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.347826087 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276733475475 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721912603671 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964270096304 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200156843279 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957563158362 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.