How can the government make sure that people save enough money to live on when they are old?
When people get older it is much harder for them to have a stable income, and thus save enough money for living. To ensure the life quality of old citizens, there are several measures that the authority could implement such as providing education, new policy and insurance.
Firstly, education is of great important for the elderly to have a non-financial stress life. If there are free courses on accounting in local communities, it would enhance people ability in managing their income and their spent. This would then make people became more conscious on their daily or monthly spending, which will probably help them saving more money for the future. However, occasionally, these courses are taken seriously since it is free. Thus, in order for this solution being carried out effectively, a great effort is required from the government.
Another possible solution is that the government directly put away a small proportion of employee monthly salary until workers reach retirement. It seemed to be easier if the authorities keep the money for the citizen rather than themselves since it cannot spend on a whim. After years of accumulation it will be return to the people. As the result, the life of the elderly is ensured. A drawback of this method is that most people are not willingly accept the fact that their income would be reduced.
Finally, whilst many people believe that health insurances are fraud and unnecessary, come with age is sadly health risks and degeneration. More often when they get older the saving is likely to be plunged by medical checks and treatments, which are undoubtedly expensive. If young citizens feel more incentive in purchasing insurances, their financial life later on would be much easier. Thus, the important of insurances should be stressed and propaganda probably by the government.
In conclusion, a financial freedom future for the people could be provided by the authority via accounting courses, saving policy and health insurances.
- Some people suggest that children do not understand the world of work and schools should make all teenagers spend a short time working as well as studying academic subjects To what extent do you agree 67
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- The charts below show how selected age groups bought concert cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2013 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...spending, which will probably help them saving more money for the future. However, occ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...selves since it cannot spend on a whim. After years of accumulation it will be return...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18885448916 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71862942488 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569659442724 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3051727488 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5882352941 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156779842108 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431511662953 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538750369613 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908339177955 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400064153504 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.