Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything Some people think that we should take effective action to improve situation Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Nowadays, our activities harm our planet. It is sometimes argued that nothing can be done to solve the negative effect of human activities on wildlife. However, some believe that it is not late to take measures to avoid loss of habitat. I believe that several steps can be used to resolve this issue. Firstly, this essay will discuss the irreversible effects of man-made disasters on the animal species, and secondly, it will analyze the risk of starvation as a detrimental consequence of reduced flora and fauna.
On the one hand, the environmentalists want a tougher line on the natural environment that preserves. Rarely do people realize the outcomes of adverse human activities. Not only is the global temperature rising at an abnormally rapid rate, but this also inevitably results in water balance that, as a result, many wild animals are under threat. For instance, having carried out research among people of metropolises, scientists have revealed that many imminent ecological disasters are caused by human endeavors.
On the other hand, loss of biodiversity is often believed to be the most critical concern as it puts humankind at risk of starvation and, I agree. If it were not for a dramatic reduction in local flora and fauna, an overwhelming majority of essential food chains would not be destroyed. As a result, people have thought about wildlife conservation in the long run. A prime example is the World Wildlife Fund that made a report that in recent years the citizens of the large cities are becoming more and more interested in the conservation of the natural world.
In conclusion, though people may vary in their opinions, I am firmly convinced that governments and individuals should do significant things to prevent the destruction of the natural environment. It is high time communities should be proactive when it comes to reducing the number of endangered species.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11575562701 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9485548079 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610932475884 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7836675076 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176361085965 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531602860402 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508996695231 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924091160009 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455984230081 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.