Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species . Some Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give our opinion.
Some actions of mankind have detrimental effects on flora and fauna. It is believed that there is no time for the public to redress their mistakes while the community think that this circumstance can be effectively improved by various solutions. From my perspective, I have a strong belief that several measures can be taken to solve this dilemma.
To begin with, some people have the right reasons to claim that it is an unsolvable problem and that nothing can be done to deal with it. Deforestation or climate change caused by human activities is so destructive that it is placing many species' lives at risk. As a consequence, many species of plants and animals are dying due to loss of habitat and human hunt. Some of them have already become extinct, thus negatively affecting the balance of the ecosystem. For example, in Vietnam where there used to be a large number of tigers, this animal has been hunted for years to satisfy human needs and there are only a few species left.
However, I strongly argue that there are a lot of things that governments and individuals can do to deal with this issue. Firstly, the issue of deforestation needs to be addressed. It is the main cause of the disappearance of endangered species around the world. Governments can plant more trees to create places for animals and plants to live and develop their population. Moreover, strict rules should be published to deter people from cutting down trees and hunting for precious animals and plants. Another solution is to raise awareness among residents about the destructive effects of our activities on the Earth and the ecosystem. Public talks and lectures about the possible consequences of mankind need to be held in order to make the public aware of their activities.
In conclusion, although society thinks that there is nothing to solve this obstacle, I personally believe that there are many effective solutions to solve it. The protection of forests and the awareness of the public are really important in dealing with this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | UL Finne | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | ktoan | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...mple, in Vietnam where there used to be a large number of tigers, this animal has been hunted for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... activities. In conclusion, although society thinks that there is nothing to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, moreover, really, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9416909621 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69921410507 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539358600583 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3846903041 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7058823529 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405344092813 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107764068615 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526399655841 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219319570438 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822540865198 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.