Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that humans are causing enormous damage to the flora and fauna of the world, leading to the debates regarding whether or not it has run out of time for human to ameliorate the situation. From my perspective, I concur that there is still hope for humankind. This essay will elaborate on both viewpoints, as well as the reasons for my stance.
On the one hand, it is justifiable why some individuals regard humans’ efforts to change the situation as useless. This can be mainly attributed to what are required to carry out these attempts. More specifically, in order to reverse the adverse effects that human activity has on the ecosystem, resources are indispensable in the process. Yet, these resources are, a large part, money and materials coming from non-eco-friendly human action, like manufacturing, construction or tourism, which actually worsens the state of affairs. Creating wildlife reserves, for example, is considered a wise measure, but in fact, the construction processes involve the use of such fuels as coal and gas. In other words, despite guaranteed security of animals, this activity is, in effect, contributing to air pollution and exacerbating energy depletion. Thus, it can be stated that the endeavors to improve the state are meaningless.
On the other hand, I opine that humans should not give up hope and continue taking action for two reasons. Firstly, the international community has now become increasingly aware of human impacts on plants and animals and are willing to unite to save the situation. With every individual around the globe paying greater attention than ever to environmental issues, it is possible to reduce negative human influence step by step and eventually reach the ultimate goal of complete harmony with nature. Secondly, in this day and age, multiple alternative energy sources have been developed, signifying breakthroughs in our efforts. In particular, we will be able to reduce the consumption of traditional fuels, hence environmental pollution and reliance on environmentally unfriendly activities, like production and building. This means that resources needed to protect the ecosystem then are generated without harming all aspects of nature.
In conclusion, although either sides have reasonable ground to stand on. I believe that preserving the ecosystem is practical given concerted action and renewable energy sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | UL Finne | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | ktoan | 89 | view |
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Gaming has become a popular e sport and has been included in some regional and international sports events Some people advocate this claiming that there is almost no risk of injury with e sports others are worried tha he increasing popularity of competiti 84
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will no longer be necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that childern should start primary school later in life others thinks that they should start it before 7 Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinio 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...world, leading to the debates regarding whether or not it has run out of time for human to ame...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ssay will elaborate on both viewpoints, as well as the reasons for my stance. On the one ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3829787234 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05244542 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.870194856 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9444444444 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19190397774 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522332150909 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384890161799 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900914624291 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059360307531 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.